top of page
Cozy bedroom with linen in grey shades
Bedroom

Why did couples often sleep in separate beds in the past? Staff writer 23 September 2019 If you've seen shows and movies that are either from or take place in the 1950s, you've probably noticed that married couples sleep in separate, side-by-side beds. As reported by twin beds weren't used to show the innocence of relationships back in those days, in fact it was the symbol of a forward-thinking couple. According to a new book from Hilary Hinds, a literature professor at Lancaster University, this dates back to the 1920s when twin beds had become the modern and fashionable choice for middle-class couples. Twin beds were often simple in design, which came to be seen as a rejection of "old-fashioned" Victorian styles and their heavy, ornate doubles. Single beds were featured as integral elements of the architectural and design visions of Modernists such as Le Corbusier. Staff writer 23 September 2019 If you've seen shows and movies that are either from or take place in the 1950s, you've probably noticed that married couples sleep in separate, side-by-side beds. As reported by Curiosity.com twin beds weren't used to show the innocence of relationships back in those days, in fact it was the symbol of a forward-thinking couple. According to a new book from Hilary Hinds, a literature professor at Lancaster University, this dates back to the 1920s when twin beds had become the modern and fashionable choice for middle-class couples. Twin beds were often simple in design, which came to be seen as a rejection of "old-fashioned" Victorian styles and their heavy, ornate doubles. Single beds were featured as integral elements of the architectural and design visions of Modernists such as Le Corbusier. - ADVERTISEMENT - This sleeping arrangement also signified a couple's progressive outlook on life, as it balanced their need for togetherness at night with a continuing commitment to separateness and individual autonomy. The identical look of the beds symbolised the egalitarian nature of a married couple - equal sized beds for equally important partners. Some even considered them the sign of a healthy sexual relationship since spending eight hours in contact every night might reduce a couple's attraction "by making the married pair grow alike physically." Ideas about couples and marriage changed after World War II, pre war, austerity and housing shortages made sex and procreation less than desirable. But afterward, as incomes rose and couples got married and had children at younger ages. Possibly as a result, separate beds slowly came to symbolise a troubled marriage, since they literally impeded a couple's physical connection. Twin beds fell out of fashion by the 1960s, bringing to an end what Hinds calls "a bold experiment in 20th-century living".

The world’s oldest bed is 77,000 years old. It was found in South Africa six years ago by a team of archaeologists led by Lyn Wadley, Professor of Archaeology at Johannesburg’s Witwatersrand University. Measuring two sq m and 30 cm deep, it was made of woven reeds and rushes covered in a sheet of insect repelling leaves. Big enough for a family, it would have been quite comfortable. Since then, our sleeping arrangements have evolved remarkably slowly. Bed frames may have raised bodies from damp and draughty floors inhabited by wide-awake insects, rats and other nocturnal biters, but many humans have been possibly less comfortable at night than the people dozing on that first bed, all those millennia ago. Perhaps there has only ever been one real revolution and that is when, from the 17th Century onwards, dedicated rooms for beds started to emerge. The bedroom evolved as the design of European houses changed and privacy became both prized and possible. This shift occurred when houses began to revolve around staircases giving on to landings, corridors and nests of private rooms no longer connected to one another in all-too-public sequences. Before then, even kings and queens could only ever hope for truly private moments in beds enclosed by curtains. Even in those societies – ancient Rome, for example – where wealth and luxury abounded in the upper echelons, bedrooms leading off an atrium were little more than small cells. Life was largely public, as it has been for Buddhist and Christian monks sleeping in communal dormitories over the centuries, for generations of children sent away to boarding schools, for hospital patients and as it still is for communes and tribal people whether in Nagaland, the Amazon or Papua New Guinea. In Europe the era of great houses and their enfilades of interconnecting rooms was also that of spectacular four-poster beds, a phenomenon reflected in well-to-do farmhouses and contemporary coaching inns. The Great Bed of Ware, since 1931 one of the most popular exhibits in London’s Victoria & Albert Museum, is so big that it could sleep eight people. Made in 1580 by Jonas Fosbrooke, a Hertfordshire carpenter, this extravagant bed was a way of attracting passing custom to the White Hart Inn in Ware, a staging post on long distance coach rides north of London. Before the advent of plumbing and the modern bathroom, bedrooms doubled up as spaces in which people would wash and groom, while in traditional Japanese houses and with the use of sliding screens and roll-up futons, a bedroom could be transformed in a matter of moments into a living room, dining room or study. Not a far cry, then, from some of the customisable ‘tiny living’ spaces that can be found in today’s most populous cities. In his spartan though sculptural Paris studio apartment, the Swiss-French architect Le Corbusier slept on an improbably tall bed. While seemingly eccentric, the view from the pillow of his bed is one over the parapet of the apartment building and across the Bois de Boulogne. The luxury here is that of light, privacy and perfectly framed views rather than drapes, damasks, curtains and Scarlett O’Hara plush. If the Modern Movement, personified by Le Corbusier, offered pure white spaces and chaste functional rooms, the modern world provided the bedroom with an industrial cornucopia of gadgetry, from the Goblin Teasmade – sold from 1936 – to the waterbed. Invented in 1968 by Charles Prior Hall, a post-graduate student at San Francisco State University and patented in 1971, the latter was as much a part of the 70s bedroom as shag pile carpets and brown and orange décor. At the peak of their popularity in 1987, waterbeds represented 22 per cent of the US domestic bed market. In Britain, the supposedly sexy waterbed was lampooned deliciously in And So to Bed, a 1974 episode of the long-running BBC TV comedy series, Steptoe and Sonwhen, at what is meant to be a highly-charged moment, the bed bursts into a pool of tepid water. In the Western world, the private bedroom has evolved into a key hob of the typical home: a playroom for children, a hideaway for teenagers, an office for the gig-economy worker and, in many 21st Century cases, into a haven resembling a hotel suite, complete with en-suite bathroom, luxurious duvets, flat screen televisions, subdued lighting and digital gizmos. Imagined concepts for the bedroom of the future include self-cleaning mattresses, biometric sensors and holographic entertainment systems. Technology, however, represents a double-edged sword for our sleep patterns. While technological advances have helped us find more comfortable sleeping materials and create near-perfect environments for a restful slumber, technology has also brought about the modern epidemic of inefficient sleep. The blue light that many of our gadgets give off can throw our body clocks out of sync, by altering the release of sleep-regulating hormones. The intrusion of smartphones, tablets and reading gadgets into our bedrooms is such an issue that the practice of good ‘sleep hygiene’ is fast become a millennial buzz theme. Ultimately, most people still crave a simple and serene bedroom, while dreaming perhaps of warm nights under stars cradled in a bed much like the one found in South Africa first made 77,000 years ago.

Rolled over: why did married couples stop sleeping in twin beds? This article is more than 2 years old A new cultural history shows that until the 1950s, forward-thinking couples regarded sharing a bed as old-fashioned and unhealthy “The twin-bed seems to have come to stay,” proclaimed the Yorkshire Herald in 1892, “and will no doubt in time succeed the double bed in all rooms occupied by two persons”. The proclamation may have proved less than accurate, but for almost a century between the 1850s and 1950s, separate beds were seen as a healthier, more modern option for couples than the double, with Victorian doctors warning that sharing a bed would allow the weaker sleeper to drain the vitality of the stronger. Delving through marriage guidance and medical advice books, furniture catalogues and novels, Lancaster University professor Hilary Hinds found that twin beds were initially adopted in the late 19th century as a health precaution. In her new book, A Cultural History of Twin Beds, Hinds details how doctors warned of the dire consequences of bed-sharing. In 1861, doctor, minister and health campaigner William Whitty Hall’s book Sleep: Or the Hygiene of the Night, advised that each sleeper “should have a single bed in a large, clean, light room, so as to pass all the hours of sleep in a pure fresh air, and that those who fail in this, will in the end fail in health and strength of limb and brain, and will die while yet their days are not all told”. In the 1880s, a series of articles by Dr Benjamin Ward Richardson warned of the risks of inhaling a bedfellow’s germs: “I cannot do better than commence what I have to say concerning beds and bedding by protesting against the double bed. The system of having beds in which two persons can sleep is always, to some extent, unhealthy.” Some doctors believed that sharing a bed would allow the stronger sleeper to rob the vitality of the weaker; one wrote of how a “pale, sickly and thin boy” had been sharing a bed with his grandmother, “a very aged person”. When they were separated at night, “the recovery was rapid”. Twin beds in the modernist Lawn Road Flats in Hampstead, London. ‘Part of that constellation of social and cultural configuration comprising modernity’ … twin beds in the modernist Lawn Road Flats in Hampstead, London. Photograph: Sydney Newberry/University of East Anglia Library In 1858, Dr James Copland warned: “But it is not in children only that debility is induced by this mode of abstracting vital power … Young females married to very old men suffer in a similar manner, although seldom to so great an extent … These facts are often well known to the aged themselves, who consider the indulgence favourable to longevity, and thereby often illustrate the selfishness which, in some persons, increases with their years.” Advertisement By the 1920s, twin beds were seen as a fashionable, modern choice. “Separate beds for every sleeper are as necessary as are separate dishes for every eater,” wrote Dr Edwin Bowers in his 1919 volume, Sleeping for Health. “They promote comfort, cleanliness, and the natural delicacy that exists among human beings.” Published by Bloomsbury Collections and funded by the Wellcome Trust, Hinds’s book lays out how, by the 1930s, twin beds were commonplace in middle-class households. But by the 1940s, writes Hinds, “they can occasion an unmistakable curl of the lip” and are “no longer the preserve of the health-conscious forward-thinking middle classes”. film poster from 1942. Goodnight sweethearts … film poster from 1942. Photograph: Everett Collection/Alamy Separate beds began to be seen as a sign of a distant or failing marriage in the 1950s. In 1956, birth-control advocate and eugenicist Marie Stopes railed against them: “Many of their inhabitants get devitalised, irritable, sleepless and unhappy, I think, because of them. The twin bed set was an invention of the Devil, jealous of married bliss,” she wrote in her final book, Sleep. By the 1960s, their cachet had gone. Hinds did not set out to write about beds: she was researching interwar fiction written by women, and kept seeing references to separate beds. “I assumed they signified what they signify now, some kind of marital distance or sexual dysfunction,” she said. But in a novel from the 1920s, she found a reference to “modern twin beds” that “stopped me in my tracks … I could not believe [they] had been part of that constellation of social and cultural configuration comprising modernity”. She went back to a household scrapbook of her great-grandmother’s, from the 1880s, which included a newspaper cutting warning against the dangers of habitual bed sharing. “I thought I might write an article … I really didn’t expect to write a book.” Despite all her research, Hinds said that she has not been tempted into acquiring twin beds. “I find myself moved by what they seem to represent about taking charge of that marital nocturnal environment, doing something different with it, rather than just doing what we’d always done in the past,” she said. “But I am a creature of my historical moment.”

It is no secret that we all use our bedrooms for different purposes. The bedroom serves many functions. A bedroom can be a place to sleep, study, entertain friends, share, and relax. How do you combine these vastly different uses into one small space? Bedrooms are typically designed simply, as rectangular rooms that include a window, a closet, and a door. The rest is a blank canvas for the owner to create a space that reflects his or her personality. How do you work within the confines of the traditional rectangular bedroom? Do you alter the architecture of the room, the building, or do you devise creative solutions for the items and furniture that go into the room? Design Brief Your challenge is to redesign your bedroom and rethink how it should, or could, function as a multi-purpose space. What does a modern bedroom look like? Consider technology- does this space embrace technology or is this a space to unplug? If you share your bedroom with someone else, how can the space be designed to accommodate you and the other person’s needs and interests? Parameters Your design must contain all the spaces and functions required for your general bedroom needs: a bed, a place to store and organize clothing, light sources (e.g. natural and artificial), and an entrance to the bedroom. The challenge is to consider and re-conceptualize these basic elements to rethink designs for new sleeping spaces, storage, organizing structures and systems for books, and other materials, access to outdoor spaces, a space to study, and a space to relax. Is this an active space, or a tranquil space? Designs must also consider issues of sustainability and the environmental impact of your design. For example, how much energy does your space consume through electronics? Can you create a more energy efficient and cheaper way of powering or lighting the room?

A quality night's rest can be hard to come by, especially if you're sleeping with a partner. Now, we're not referring to "sleeping together." That's a whole different topic. What we are talking about is snoozing alongside your significant other. Getting 7 to 8 hours of slumber can be quite the obstacle for both parties due to annoying sleep habits — e.g. snoring, cover stealing, sleep talking, etc. With all of these potential disturbances, why do we even sleep together in the first place, and would it be better to sleep alone? Why Do We Sleep Together? In 2011, a team of archaeologists unearthed the world's oldest bed in South Africa. https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/11/111208-oldest-mattress-africa-archaeology-science/ Dated at 77,000 years old, the bed was made of woven reeds and rushes with a layer of insect repelling leaves as its sheet. The spacious 21.5 square foot bed was a generous 12 inches deep and big enough for a family and some livestock. Since then, sleeping arrangements have changed with the needs of the times. couple in bed One of the most prevalent reasons why couples sleep together is because of finances. This dates back to as early as the 1800s, where lower-class couples — sometimes with their kids - had no choice but to sleep in the same bed together due to the high price tag on mattresses. Today, while mattresses can cost less than $1,000, some couples may not have the luxury of a second bedroom. Another reason why people tend to sleep together is that humans have an instinctive fear of the dark. Researchers have theorized that this stems from the early days of humanity when people weren't at the top of the food chain, so they were vulnerable to predators that mostly hunted at night. Therefore, bedmates help provide a sense of security and alleviate anxiety during the dark hours. The main reason two people sleep together is because humans are affectionate beings who crave intimacy and connectedness. For couples with kids, busy schedules or both, the bed can be the only place to have some alone time, bond and talk about each other's days. The Pros and Cons of Sleeping Together When it comes to sleeping with your partner or spouse, it does have its benefits, both physical and psychological. One study found that men and women perceived a better-quality slumber when they snoozed together. Researchers attributed this perceived improvement to the love and support couples receive in a relationship. SHEEX Couple Sleeping Cuddling has been shown to ease the body and mind and can be a very important nighttime ritual. The act helps lower cortisol, a stress hormone that causes anxiety and cognitive function. Cuddling also releases oxytocin, the "love hormone" that is known to mitigate anxiety levels, and can help reduce cytokines that are connected to inflammation. Sleeping together isn't all sunshine and rainbows, though. In fact, research from the Better Sleep Council discovered that one in three Americans said their bedmate had a negative effect on their sleep. Another survey reported that 31% of 3,000 respondents said they wanted a "sleep divorce" from their partner. This means couples either sleep in different beds in the same space or each member goes to a separate room. There are multiple factors to why couples resort to a sleep divorce. One partner's sleeping habits can preempt the other from getting a good night's rest. Snoring is a big issue among bedmates. On average, people who slumber with a snoring partner lose an hour of sleep per night. Other reasons couples are opting for a sleep divorce are having different sleep schedules, hogging of the blankets, and being too hot or cold. The use of phones or tablets in bed is another increasingly common disturbance when sleeping together. The light from mobile devices is known to disrupt your body's natural sleep cycle, so if your partner is trying to fall asleep but you're playing with your phone in bed, this can lead to poorer quality sleep for both of you. Should You Sleep Together or Alone? If you are experiencing disturbances from your partner but want to keep the benefits of sleeping together, compromise. For couples with different sleeping schedules, try to find a mattress that doesn't allow for a lot of motion transfer. Snoring partners should consider looking into anti-snoring products or sleeping their side. When it comes to using mobile devices in bed, have a rule that they are not allowed in bed. If none of these solutions works, it may be best to consider sleeping on twin beds or in separate rooms. Whether you sleep with someone or alone, make sure your bed is optimized for a good night's rest with SHEEX® Performance Bedding. Offering unrivaled comfort, innovative breathability and moisture-wicking technologies, our bedding creates ideal sleeping conditions for a deeper, cooler slumber.

bottom of page